Mukan Erkin Törük
6852832fe8
Some checks failed
CodeQL / Analyze (push) Waiting to run
Docker Build & Push Simapp (main) / docker-build (push) Waiting to run
golangci-lint / lint (push) Waiting to run
Tests / Code Coverage / build (amd64) (push) Waiting to run
Tests / Code Coverage / build (arm64) (push) Waiting to run
Tests / Code Coverage / unit-tests (map[additional-args:-tags="test_e2e" name:e2e path:./e2e]) (push) Waiting to run
Tests / Code Coverage / unit-tests (map[name:08-wasm path:./modules/light-clients/08-wasm]) (push) Waiting to run
Tests / Code Coverage / unit-tests (map[name:ibc-go path:.]) (push) Waiting to run
Deploy to GitHub Pages / Deploy to GitHub Pages (push) Has been cancelled
Buf-Push / push (push) Has been cancelled
38 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
38 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
# ADR \{ADR-NUMBER\}: \{TITLE\}
|
|
|
|
## Changelog
|
|
|
|
- \{date\}: \{changelog\}
|
|
|
|
## Status
|
|
|
|
> A decision may be "proposed" if it hasn't been agreed upon yet, or "accepted" once it is agreed upon. If a later ADR changes or reverses a decision, it may be marked as "deprecated" or "superseded" with a reference to its replacement.
|
|
|
|
\{Deprecated|Proposed|Accepted\}
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
> This section contains all the context one needs to understand the current state, and why there is a problem. It should be as succinct as possible and introduce the high-level idea behind the solution.
|
|
|
|
## Decision
|
|
|
|
> This section explains all of the details of the proposed solution, including implementation details.
|
|
It should also describe affects / corollary items that may need to be changed as a part of this.
|
|
If the proposed change will be large, please also indicate a way to do the change to maximize ease of review.
|
|
(e.g. the optimal split of things to do between separate PR's)
|
|
|
|
## Consequences
|
|
|
|
> This section describes the consequences, after applying the decision. All consequences should be summarized here, not just the "positive" ones.
|
|
|
|
### Positive
|
|
|
|
### Negative
|
|
|
|
### Neutral
|
|
|
|
## References
|
|
|
|
> Are there any relevant PR comments, issues that led up to this, or articles referenced for why we made the given design choice? If so link them here!
|
|
|
|
- \{reference link\}
|